|
BugTraq
Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 03 2006 03:08PM Romain Le Guen romainl com (1 replies) Re: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 04 2006 12:40PM 3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU) (2 replies) Re: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 05 2006 10:12AM Christine Kronberg (seeker shalla de) (2 replies) Re[2]: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 10 2006 12:22PM 3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU) (1 replies) Re[2]: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 10 2006 07:34PM Christine Kronberg (seeker shalla de) (2 replies) Re: Re[2]: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 16 2006 03:28AM Thor (Hammer of God) (thor hammerofgod com) (1 replies) Re: Re[2]: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 16 2006 09:35PM Christine Kronberg (seeker shalla de) Re[3]: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 15 2006 11:17AM 3APA3A (3APA3A SECURITY NNOV RU) (1 replies) Re: Bypassing ISA Server 2004 with IPv6 Apr 09 2006 10:44PM Thor (Hammer of God) (thor hammerofgod com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
Dear 3APA3A,
> Microsoft ISA Server can't filter events from Microsoft Mouse, but
Apples and peas?
> Microsoft Mouse can be bound to computer. It's security risk, but I know
> how to secure mouse without ISA and I accept this risk.
Nice, that you do. If I manage by any means to see remotely
that you have attached a mouse to your ISA and to (ab)use it,
I'm much better that I thought - and you have much bigger problems
than you thought.
The nice thing about icmp is that I do not require much knowledge
to get information remotely. Same true with ipv6. Unless something
in between stops me. Which brings us back to the topic: a firewall
allowing too much.
> IPv6 can not be filtered by ISA, but it still can be filtered by
> different tools, or by it's own means, as IPv6 support network-level
> security. Unlike IPv4, IPv6 supports authentication, integrity checking
> and encryption natively. See ipsec6.exe and descriptions for Security
> Association Batabase and Security Policy Database.
So you state that it is perfectly well for a firewall to allow
any traffic through. Per default? And that this firewall does not
need to have the interface to configure what traffic is allowed?
I disagree.
If a firewall supports a protocol, that same firewall should also
provide the proper means and interface to configure it. And not blow
holes in networks.
Cheers,
Christine Kronberg.
[ reply ]