|
BugTraq
Re: Re: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 21 2006 11:52PM nabiy hotmail com (2 replies) Re: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 24 2006 05:07AM Ronald Chmara (ron Opus1 COM) (1 replies) RE: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 26 2006 04:06PM Geo. (geoincidents nls net) (3 replies) Re: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 26 2006 05:45PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (1 replies) Re: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 23 2006 08:16PM Crispin Cowan (crispin novell com) (3 replies) Re: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 24 2006 12:43PM Glynn Clements (glynn gclements plus com) Re: PHP security (or the lack thereof) Jun 24 2006 08:28AM Daniel Hulme (bugtraq doublezero uklinux net) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> ...
> > "The configuration flexibility of PHP is equally rivalled by the code
> > flexibility. PHP can be used to build complete server applications,
> > with all the power of a shell user, or it can be used for simple
> > server-side includes with little risk in a tightly controlled
> > environment. How you build that environment, and how secure it is, is
> > largely up to the PHP developer."
>
> And is the default install wide open or tightly controlled? I mean from a
> security standpoint we have been screaming for years at Microsoft to change
> their defaults to firewall on and things locked instead of open.
>
> Is php secure by default when it's installed on a server?
>
This question does not really have any meaning. If you ask, if php
_applications_ are secure by default, the answer is of course "it
depends" (most php applications are broken. Just do a
"grep -R eval ." and see for yourself)
The php safe_mode is not really safe. magic_quotes_gpc is broken by
design. Where does that leave us? Write secure code, validate all input
or get hacked, as is the case with every other software/language.
[ reply ]