|
BugTraq
Internet Explorer 7 - Still Spyware Writers' Heaven Nov 01 2006 10:07PM avivra (avivra gmail com) (1 replies) RE: Internet Explorer 7 - Still Spyware Writers' Heaven Nov 02 2006 09:45PM Roger A. Grimes (roger banneretcs com) (1 replies) Re: Internet Explorer 7 - Still Spyware Writers' Heaven Nov 04 2006 02:25AM Eliah Kagan (degeneracypressure gmail com) (2 replies) Re: Internet Explorer 7 - Still Spyware Writers' Heaven Nov 04 2006 01:03PM Thierry Zoller (Thierry Zoller lu) |
|
Privacy Statement |
initial exploit in the first place, that would then allow them to muck
with path statements or place code in path executable areas. I mean, do
you get it, yet? If the malware writer figures out how do the initial
exploit, anything can be done, not just the path tricks.
My WhereWindowsMalwareHides
document(http://weblog.infoworld.com/securityadviser/archives/2006/05/up
dated_where_w.html)contains over 145 different tricks and locations
where malware can hide and live, along with the path trick. Your point
is a valid point, but it's been a known issue for years.
You can't skip over the hardest part, the initial exploit, and start
picking on one of over a hundred ways to muck with Windows users and
call "IE 7 a Spyware Writer's Heaven". I mean you can, but it looks like
you're grasping at straws. At least tell us something new, and not
something that's been documented for years.
Roger
-----Original Message-----
From: Eliah Kagan [mailto:degeneracypressure (at) gmail (dot) com [email concealed]]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 9:26 PM
To: full-disclosure (at) lists.grok.org (dot) uk [email concealed]; bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Subject: Re: Internet Explorer 7 - Still Spyware Writers' Heaven
On 11/2/06, Roger A. Grimes wrote:
> So, if you're statement is accurate that malware would need to be
> placed in a directory identified by the PATH statement, we can relax
> because that would require Administrator access to pull off. Admin
> access would be needed to modify the PATH statement appropriately to
> include the user's desktop or some other new user writable location or
> Admin access would be needed to copy a file into the locations
> indicated by the default PATH statement.
It would not require *administrator* access--non-administrator users can
still add things to their own PATHs, just not to the universal, system
PATH. (See Control Panel > System > Advanced > Environment
Variables.)
-Eliah
[ reply ]