|
|
BugTraq
Re: [BLACKLIST] [Full-disclosure] Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on yournetwork? Feb 12 2007 12:52PM Thierry Zoller (Thierry Zoller lu) (1 replies) RE: [BLACKLIST] [Full-disclosure] Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on yournetwork? Feb 13 2007 01:56PM Michael Wojcik (Michael Wojcik microfocus com) (2 replies) Re: [BLACKLIST] [Full-disclosure] Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on yournetwork? Feb 13 2007 08:15PM Casper Dik Sun COM RE: [BLACKLIST] [Full-disclosure] Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on yournetwork? Feb 13 2007 07:59PM Gadi Evron (ge linuxbox org) (2 replies) Re: [BLACKLIST] [Full-disclosure] Solaris telnet vulnberability - Feb 15 2007 03:49AM Darren Reed (avalon caligula anu edu au) |
|
Privacy Statement |
> [...]
> One note: although it could just as well be a bug, who says it was not a
> backdoor in the early 90's?
>
> Also, I understand this does not work on older Solaris/SunOS systems
> (anyone can verify?)
I can. It is not present in anything before Solaris 10.
> which adds to my personal interest in the
> possibility. I refuse to believe someone is that funny/sad.
Not sure what you mean here... You don't believe this is a (very
unfortunate) accident?
From where I stand (pretty close to the fire) this is pretty much
what it looks like (an extended multi-file, multi-entrance-point
change with unforseen and unnoticed interdependencies).
Joep
[ reply ]