BugTraq
Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 14 2007 10:23PM
Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf dione ids pl) (2 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 15 2007 02:31PM
pdp (architect) (pdp gnucitizen googlemail com) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 15 2007 02:58PM
Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf dione ids pl) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 15 2007 03:17PM
pdp (architect) (pdp gnucitizen googlemail com) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 15 2007 03:25PM
pdp (architect) (pdp gnucitizen googlemail com) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 16 2007 07:31AM
Base64 (base640 gmail com) (1 replies)
This vuln is not exploitable in this condition against IIS server 6
and possibly earlier versions. IIS will die on the null character in
the new request. It doesn't seem like anyone has brought up this
fact.

Example (IIS): location.hostname='microsoft.com\x00www.coredump.cx';

Output:
microsoft.com returns '400 Bad Request.'.

Any input would be appreciated until the obvious patch comes out.

Regards,
base

On 2/15/07, pdp (architect) <pdp.gnucitizen (at) googlemail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> weird, firefox slowly dies out
>
> t2.html
> <html>
> <body>
> <iframe src="t1.html"></iframe>
> </body>
> </html>
>
> t1.html
> <html>
> <body>
> <script>location.hostname="blog.com";</script>
> </body>
> </html>
>
>
> On 2/15/07, pdp (architect) <pdp.gnucitizen (at) googlemail (dot) com [email concealed]> wrote:
> > the first one runs in about:blank which is restricted. the second one
> > is very interesting but still not very useful because it acts like
> > about:blank. hmmm it seams that the hostname field has been seriously
> > overlooked.
> >
> > On 2/15/07, Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf (at) dione.ids (dot) pl [email concealed]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, pdp (architect) wrote:
> > >
> > > > I wander whether we can execute code on about:config or about:cache.
> > >
> > > Actually, there are several odd problems related to location updates and
> > > location.hostname specifically, including one scenario that apparently
> > > makes the script run with document.location in about: namespace.
> > >
> > > I did not research them any further, so I can't say if they're
> > > exploitable - but you can see a demo here, feel free to poke around:
> > >
> > > http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/fftests.html
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > /mz
> > > http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
> > http://www.gnucitizen.org
> >
>
>
> --
> pdp (architect) | petko d. petkov
> http://www.gnucitizen.org
>

[ reply ]
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 22 2007 01:08AM
Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf dione ids pl)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 14 2007 11:27PM
Ben Bucksch (news bucksch org) (1 replies)
Re: [Full-disclosure] Firefox: serious cookie stealing / same-domain bypass vulnerability Feb 14 2007 11:33PM
Peter Besenbruch (prb lava net) (1 replies)


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus