Dear Tim Brown,

--Friday, May 4, 2007, 1:50:40 AM, you wrote to 3APA3A (at) security.nnov (dot) ru [email concealed]:

TB> On Thursday 03 May 2007 22:13:15 3APA3A wrote:

>> This vulnerability for D-Link DSL-G624T was already reported by Jose
>> Ramon Palanco. See
>>
>> http://securityvulns.ru/Odocument816.html
>>

TB> However,
TB> as I also point out in the Solutions section, all of the issues you list were
TB> against major version 1 of the firmware. We're now at major version 3 and
TB> directory traversal is still a problem.

Not exactly, read first link carefully:

Tested on D-Link DSL-G624T
Version: Firmware Version : V3.00B01T01.YA-C.20060616

Discovered by:

Jose Ramon Palanco: jose.palanco(at)eazel(dot).es

These firmware date is even newer than yours :)

TB> Secondly, the Javascript injection issue describe is as far as I
TB> know /entirely new/. It's not a short walk to the point where these two
TB> issues alone could be use to compromise devices, irrespective of the firmware
TB> issues you also link to.

Jose mentions both directory traversal and 3 examples of crossite
scripting. Crossite scripting examples are different from yours though
and require POST request. Your CSS is easier to exploit.

TB> Maybe, I'm hoping that by version 10 of the firmware in the year 2014, D-Link
TB> may actually manage to fix some of these reported problems? Moreover, maybe
TB> they'll actually make it possible for researchers to report these things in a
TB> manner whereby they actually respond to the reports when contacted. Not
TB> holding my breath though.

In fact, at least Russian D-Link support is very responsive to any bug
report, but it seems like only way to get a response is to post a
problem on their forum.

--
~/ZARAZA http://securityvulns.com/

[ reply ]