SecurityFocus

Re: COSEINC Linux Advisory #1: Linux Kernel Parent Process Death Signal Vulnerability Aug 16 2007 01:17PM
Dan Yefimov (dan ns15 lightwave net ru) (1 replies)

Re: COSEINC Linux Advisory #1: Linux Kernel Parent Process Death Signal Vulnerability Aug 16 2007 07:37PM
Glynn Clements (glynn gclements plus com) (1 replies)

Re: COSEINC Linux Advisory #1: Linux Kernel Parent Process Death Signal Vulnerability Aug 17 2007 01:27AM
Dan Yefimov (dan ns15 lightwave net ru) (2 replies)

Re: COSEINC Linux Advisory #1: Linux Kernel Parent Process DeathSignal Vulnerability Aug 17 2007 08:20PM
Nicolas Rachinsky (bugtraq-0 ml turing-complete org)

* Dan Yefimov <dan (at) ns15.lightwave.net (dot) ru [email concealed]> [2007-08-17 05:27 +0400]:
> BTW, SIGKILL and SIGSTOP can be issued by an O_ASYNC file I/O also (look in
> fcntl(2) at F_SETSIG section). If you use F_SETSIG for sending SIGKILL or
> SIGSTOP, there's nothing to be done with that - that behaviour is well

Looking in that man page I see:
F_GETSIG and F_SETSIG are Linux-specific.

Nicolas

--
http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas

[ reply ]

Re: COSEINC Linux Advisory #1: Linux Kernel Parent Process Death Signal Vulnerability Aug 17 2007 01:37PM
Glynn Clements (glynn gclements plus com)