|
BugTraq
New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 01 2008 03:39PM Stefan Frei (stefan frei techzoom net) (2 replies) RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 01 2008 07:31PM Larry Seltzer (larry larryseltzer com) (2 replies) RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 01 2008 08:39PM Paul Schmehl (pauls utdallas edu) (1 replies) RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 02 2008 12:27AM Nick FitzGerald (nick virus-l demon co uk) (2 replies) Re: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 02 2008 03:44PM Rainer Duffner (rainer ultra-secure de) Re: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 01 2008 08:02PM Rob Thompson (my security lists gmail com) RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk Jul 01 2008 07:26PM Larry Seltzer (larry larryseltzer com) |
|
Privacy Statement |
-------------------------------------------------
This message is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, the implied warranties of accuracy, correct grammar and spelling, lack of vulgarity or adult themes, correct references, absence of viruses and/or viral memes, originality, or fitness for any particular purpose.
-------------------------------------------------
--- On Tue, 7/1/08, Nick FitzGerald <nick (at) virus-l.demon.co (dot) uk [email concealed]> wrote:
> From: Nick FitzGerald <nick (at) virus-l.demon.co (dot) uk [email concealed]>
> Subject: RE: New Paper: More than 600 million users surf at high risk
> To: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
> Date: Tuesday, July 1, 2008, 8:27 PM
> Paul Schmehl to Larry Seltzer:
>
> > My completely non-scientific,
> unsupported-by-empirical-evidence answer is
> > no. It's because people who use Firefox tend to
> be more aware of security
> > threats and the need to keep software up to date. It
> could also be (at
> > least in part) because Firefox has a built-in,
> enabled-by-default, update
> > available warning system.
>
> I would agree with both those reasons and add that FF
> updates are not
> hampered by the disabling of the inbuilt (and often
> seriously mistrusted)
> OS auto-update mechanisms.
>
> I also _suspect_ that a lot of pirated copies of Windows
> probably have
> system updates disabled.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nick FitzGerald
[ reply ]