|
|
BugTraq
Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Aug 30 2008 12:05AM Duncan Simpson (dps simpson demon co uk) (5 replies) Re: Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Sep 03 2008 04:40PM Jerry Franz (jfranz freerun com) Re: Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Sep 03 2008 07:46AM terry white (twhite aniota com) Re: Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Sep 03 2008 12:25AM Glynn Clements (glynn gclements plus com) Re: Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Sep 02 2008 11:59PM Ansgar Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies) Re: Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Sep 04 2008 01:34PM Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers (bugtraq planetcobalt net) (1 replies) Re: Has anyone implemented "double forward DNS"? Sep 05 2008 09:11AM Steven Bakker (steven bakker ams-ix net) |
|
Privacy Statement |
[...]
> Of course if the bad guy also controls the client's information
> about the reverse zone it still loses.
Under what circumstances do you expect the attacker to be able to
spoof/poison responses for one query but not the other?
> The major problem I can see is that there might that hosts in
> ISP's dynamically allocated address pools might all fail double
> forward DNS checks.
[...]
How about a the very common situation of name-based virtual hosting?
Do you propose a round-robin of multiple pointer resource records
for a single IP address, one for each domain hosted at that same
address? That could easily exceed a resolver's maximum response
length...
--
{ IRL(Jeremy_Stanley); PGP(9E8DFF2E4F5995F8FEADDC5829ABF7441FB84657);
SMTP(fungi (at) yuggoth (dot) org [email concealed]); IRC(fungi (at) irc.yuggoth (dot) org [email concealed]#ccl); ICQ(114362511);
AIM(dreadazathoth); YAHOO(crawlingchaoslabs); FINGER(fungi (at) yuggoth (dot) org [email concealed]);
MUD(fungi (at) katarsis.mudpy (dot) org [email concealed]:6669); WWW(http://fungi.yuggoth.org/); }
[ reply ]