BugTraq
Integer overflow in .NET Framework System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.Utility class Jul 25 2015 07:02AM
Securify B.V. (lists securify nl) (1 replies)
Re: Integer overflow in .NET Framework System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.Utility class Sep 08 2015 05:58PM
Securify B.V. (lists securify nl)
Microsoft released MS15-101 that addresses this issue:
https://technet.microsoft.com/library/security/ms15-101

On 25-07-15 09:02, Securify B.V. wrote:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Integer overflow in .NET Framework
> System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.Utility class
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Yorick Koster, May 2015
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Abstract
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> An integer overflow exists in the
> System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.Utility class of the .NET Framework.
> Triggering this issue results in an overflown integer that is used to
> allocate a buffer on the heap that is too small, resulting in memory
> corruption. Exploiting this issues appears to be difficult.
> Consequently, Microsoft has decided to not release a security bulletin.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Affected versions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> This issue affects .NET Framework version 4.5 and 4.6. Other versions
> are not affected as this issue can only be triggered using large arrays
> (> 2GB).
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Fix
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> There is currently no fix available for this issue. Microsoft will not
> release a security bulletin, it may be fixed in future versions of the
> .NET Framework.
>
> [...] [we] are going to pursue this as a candidate for improvement in
> future versions, [...] On x86, the feasibility of an attack is mitigated
> by the maximum process memory and even on amd64, prevailing
> configurations preclude this from being a feasible attack.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> Details
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

> https://www.securify.nl/advisory/SFY20150501/integer_overflow_in__net_fr
amework_system_directoryservices_protocols_utility_class.html
>

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus