Back to list
RE: [FD] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 56):arbitrary code execution WITH escalation of privilege via rufus*.exe
Aug 06 2018 05:16PM
Andrius Duksta (duk danskebank lt)
Sorry, but the viable/practical attack vector on this one is practically non-existent. I really can't see anyone actually using this as a real-life attack. The circumstances required to succeed are such that if this attack works, it's waaay too late to blame Rufus as your system was obviously already compromised in other ways.
From: Fulldisclosure [mailto:fulldisclosure-bounces (at) seclists (dot) org [email concealed]] On Behalf Of Stefan Kanthak
Sent: 2018 m. rugpjûèio 3 d., penktadienis 16:16
To: bugtraq (at) securityfocus (dot) com [email concealed]
Cc: fulldisclosure (at) seclists (dot) org [email concealed]
Subject: [FD] Executable installers are vulnerable^WEVIL (case 56): arbitrary code execution WITH escalation of privilege via rufus*.exe
like their predecessors, the recently (2018-05-29, 2018-06-19) published versions 3.0 and 3.1 of "Rufus" are riddled with bloody beginners errors, which ALL allow arbitrary code execution WITH escalation of privilege, in MULTIPLE ways.
JFTR: to support and ease further attacks, this crap is built
without ASLR and without stack cookies/canaries!
rufus-3.0.exe, rufus-3.0p.exe, rufus-3.1.exe and rufus-3.1p.exe are susceptible to DLL spoofing alias DLL search order hijacking: on a fully patched Windows 7, they load at least the following Windows system DLLs from their "application directory", typically the user's "Downloads" directory %USERPROFILE%\Downloads\, instead from Windows "system directory" %SystemRoot%\System32\, resulting in arbitrary code execution:
DWMAPI.dll, UXTheme.dll, Version.dll, CryptSP.dll, NCrypt.dll,
BCrypt.dll, RichEd20.dll, DSRole.dll, LogonCli.dll, DFSCli.dll,
For this well-known and well-documented vulnerability see <https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/426.html> and <https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/427.html> plus <https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/471.html>.
Additionally see Microsoft's developer guidance <https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2269637.aspx>,
<https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682586.aspx> und <http://blogs.technet.com/b/srd/archive/2014/05/13/load-library-safely.a
to avoid this bloody beginner's error.
for "prior art".
And last but not least the 20+ year old
Since the clueless developer specified "requireAdministrator" in the embedded application manifest, his crap can only be run with administrative privileges, resulting in arbitary code execution WITH escalation of privilege.
Demonstration/proof of concept #1:
1. Follow the instructions from
and build a testbed/minefield of 32-bit DLLs in your
2. Download <https://rufus.akeo.ie/downloads/rufus-3.0.exe> and
<https://rufus.akeo.ie/downloads/rufus-3.0p.exe> and save them
in your "Downloads" directory.
3. Run rufus-3.0.exe and rufus-3.0p.exe: notice the message boxes
displayed from multiple DLLs created in step 1!
4. Download <https://rufus.akeo.ie/downloads/rufus-3.1.exe> and
<https://rufus.akeo.ie/downloads/rufus-3.1p.exe> and save them
in your "Downloads" directory.
5. Run rufus-3.1.exe and rufus-3.1p.exe: notice the message boxes
displayed from at least DSROLE.DLL created in step 1!
JFTR: if you don't see a message box: open the event log and view
the entries from source "Vulnerability and Exploit Detector".
DUMP the executable installer, DUMP the portable crap, provide an .MSI, or a .CAB plus an .INF script.
Although running with administrative privileges, this crap extracts files UNPROTECTED  into the "current working directory" for later execution (and into the user's %TEMP% directory for later use).
For this well-known and well-documented vulnerability see <https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/377.html> and <https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/379.html> plus <https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/29.html>
An unprivileged user/process running in the same user account  can modify the extracted files between their creation and use, and can even create bogus files instead, which this crap then executes.
Remember that it runs with administrative rights!
Demonstration/proof of concept #2a:
1. Open a command prompt, then run the following command lines:
COPY %COMSPEC% rufus.com
ATTRIB.exe +R rufus.com
2. Run the following command line:
Notice the string "rufus.com\n" pasted into the command prompt
window (really: into the window which happens to have focus) and
the copy of the command processor started.
3. Run the following command line:
Again notice the string "rufus.com\n" pasted into the command
prompt window, and the subsequent dialog box stating that
another instance of this crap is already running.
Demonstration/proof of concept #2b:
1. Run the following command lines in the still open command
ATTRIB.exe -R rufus.com
2. Run the command lines
3. Notice the error messages
| "rufus.com" is not recognized as an internal or external command,
| operable program or batch file.
from the command prompt, and the complete failure of this crap.
Demonstration/proof of concept #2c:
1. Add the NTFS ACE "(D;OIIO;WP;;;WD)" meaning "deny execution of
files in this directory for everyone, inheritable to files in
subdirectories" to the current working directory
2. Run the vulnerable applications: notice their complete failure,
they neither display their window nor any error message!
3. View the access rights of the file "rufus.com" created in the
stay tuned, and FAR AWAY from such vulnerable and defective crap Stefan Kanthak
 on Windows, every developer past absolute beginner uses the
fourth argument of CreateFile()
or the second argument of CreateDirectory()
to specify a "security descriptor" with the desired and needed
access rights, at least and especially when running privileged.
 the ONE and ONLY user account created during Windows setup is an
administrator account, and it is used by the vast majority of
Windows users for their everyday work: according to Microsoft's
own telemetry data, as published in their "Security Intelligence
about 1/2 to 3/4 of all (some 600 million) Windows installations
report only one active user account.
Sent through the Full Disclosure mailing list https://nmap.org/mailman/listinfo/fulldisclosure
Web Archives & RSS: http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/
Ðioje þinutëje esanti informacija gali bûti konfidenciali. Jeigu ðià þinutæ gavote per klaidà, praðome gràþinti jà siuntëjui atsakant á gautà laiðkà ir iðkart iðtrinkite þinutæ ið Jûsø sistemos nekopijuojant, neplatinant ir neiðsisaugant jos.
Nors esame ásitikinæ, kad ði þinutë ir prie jos esantys priedai nëra uþkrësti virusais ar kitaip paþeisti, dël ko galëtø bûti paveiktas kompiuteris ar IT sistema, kurioje þinutë gauta ir skaitoma, adresatas atidarydamas failà prisiima rizikà. Mes neatsakome uþ nuostolius ar þalà, galinèius atsirasti dël ðios þinutës gavimo ar kitokio naudojimo.
Please note that this message may contain confidential information. If you have received this message by mistake, please inform the sender of the mistake by sending a reply, then delete the message from your system without making, distributing or retaining any copies of it. Although we believe that the message and any attachments are free from viruses and other errors that might affect the computer or IT system where it is received and read, the recipient opens the message at his or her own risk. We assume no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the receipt or use of this message.
[ reply ]
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus