RE: [logs] Star Trek and Log Integrity May 06 2008 09:07PM
Marcus J. Ranum (mjr ranum com) (1 replies)
chris.wee (at) loglogic (dot) com [email concealed] wrote:
>It is so disappointing that even in the 24th century, computer logs are
>not tamper-proof.

What do you expect from a starship that runs on Windows-24k? Microsoft
added support for syslog in 2348 - citing customer demand - but still
has no Enterprise-class log architecture.

PS: :)
LogAnalysis mailing list
LogAnalysis (at) loganalysis (dot) org [email concealed]

[ reply ]
Re: [logs] Star Trek and Log Integrity May 06 2008 10:05PM
Bill Burge (bill burge com)


Privacy Statement
Copyright 2010, SecurityFocus