It has recently been reported that Attorneys Generals from about a dozen U.S. States, including Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Mississippi, Maryland, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania have demanded that News Corporations social networking site MySpace voluntarily deliver to the AGs a list of all sex offenders who have registered for or used the MySpace social networking service.
It is clear that people both registered sex offenders and others use social networking sites like MySpace and Facebook to meet other people. It is also clear that these sites can be used by individuals interested in violent criminal activity including sexual predation, abduction and other crimes, to further criminal activity. The question is however, the extent to which the operators of the sites should step into the shoes of law enforcement and identify not just those who are engaging in criminal activity on the site, but also to identify FOR law enforcement those who might later engage in criminal activity based upon the fact that they had committed crimes in the past.
So, MySpace can use or disclose information about you including your IP information, subscriber information, even the contents of MySpace IM or e-mail if it wants to enforce its policies, protect its rights, or if there is a threat to the safety of the public. Why then was it appropriate for them to demand that the AGs get a subpoena for the sex offender information?
The AGs Response
Partially in response to public criticism, and partly to act as a good corporate citizen" MySpace recently started using an online name, address and criminal history verification service provided by Sentinel Tech Holding Company http://www.sentryweb.com/ to help them determine if people who joined the site using their real names, real addresses, and real e-mail addresses were convicted of sex offenses. Clearly MySpace was trying to do something about the problem of sexual predators using their service. If they found a convicted and registered sex offender, MySpace would kick them off, and they would remain off the service (at least until they could figure out how to use a fictitious email address.) The sentry service does not purport to determine the nature of the restrictions on the person convicted the terms of parole or probation, etc., only the fact that they were convicted. Nevertheless, if you were a convicted sex offender AND the Sentinel software detected you, MySpace would kick you off.
Use of and Membership in the MySpace Services is void where prohibited. By using the MySpace Services, you represent and warrant that (a) all registration information you submit is truthful and accurate; (b) you will maintain the accuracy of such information; (c) you are 14 years of age or older; and (d) your use of the MySpace Services does not violate any applicable law or regulation. Your profile may be deleted and your Membership may be terminated without warning, if we believe that you are under 14 years of age.
Nothing here about convictions, probation, or sex offenses. But remember, you dont have a RIGHT to use MySpace. Its a private website. As a general rule they dont have to let you on, although they might have liability if the precluded "membership" based upon some prohibited classification e.g., race or national origin, but that is not entirely clear. Indeed, in creating state "registered sex offender" laws, many states mandated that they not be used for certain discriminatory purposes. Indeed, the Connecticut sex offender registry explicitly states that any person who uses information in this registry to injure, harass or commit a criminal act against any person included in the registry or any other person is subject to criminal prosecution." So MySpace might be within its rights to kick off sex offenders if it wants to, although they are under no legal obligation to do so, or for that matter, to police their site for improper activity. It reportedly has already removed about 7,000 profiles of registered sex offenders.
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 USC 2702, limits the legal authority of "a person or entity providing an electronic communication service to the public" to disclose either the contents of electronic communications (e-mail or IM) or subscriber information, noting:
. . . a provider of remote computing service or electronic communication service to the public shall not knowingly divulge a record or other information pertaining to a subscriber to or customer of such service . . . to any governmental entity.
Of course, the statute contains certain relevant exceptions, including when the cops are armed with a subpoena, search warrant or administrative subpoena or when:
. . .the provider reasonably believes that an emergency involving immediate danger of death or serious physical injury to any person justifies disclosure of the information;
The statute also allows the service provider to turn over records to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children http://www.missingkids.com/ when there is a crime involving the distribution of child pornography. But nothing about providing information about registered sex offenders just cause the cops were curious.
Now lets be clear on something. MySpace always intended to shut down the registered sex offenders. MySpace always intended to share the relevant information with law enforcement. The question was whether they would do it without a warrant.