, SecurityFocus 2008-02-29
Story continued from Page 1
The second part of the Cyber Initiative calls for improvement to the EINSTEIN intrusion detection system and the deployment of the system to monitor all 50 Internet access points. Currently, EINSTEIN conducts flow analysis -- tracking the source, destination, port and size of packets on the networks of 15 federal agencies.
"We only monitor a very small percentage of federal network traffic," Jamison told the committee members. "We want, through this initiative, to increase that to 100 percent of all federal network traffic."
The information is analyzed on a daily basis, and so cannot detect threats in real time, DHS's Jamison said. The system would be enhanced to do more real-time analysis, he said.
"We are currently not looking at any content," Jamison said. "We are proposing that we are going to do that. The threats are real. Our adversaries are really adept at hiding their attacks in normal everyday traffic. The only way to really protect your networks is to have intrusion detection capabilities."
Attacks on federal agencies have become a focus of the Committee on Homeland Security. A year ago, the House Subcommittee on Emerging Threats, Cybersecurity, and Science and Technology heard testimony from representatives of the Departments of State and Commerce regarding attacks on those agencies' systems the previous year. The Department of State acknowledged in June 2006 that attackers had installed remote access software on systems in the agency and abroad, stolen passwords and targeted information on China and North Korea. In October 2006, the Department of Commerce took hundreds of computers offline following a series of attacks aimed at federal employees' computer accounts by online thieves that appear to be based in China.
Germany, the United Kingdom and the U.S. have all accused Chinese funded hackers of breaching their government networks.
A few committee members questioned whether the network monitoring system could cause privacy problems, if the government increased its capabilities.
"My constituents are asking about this," said Rep. Jane Harman (D-CA), a member of the Committee on Homeland Security. "'Government sets up spy network,' that is how they are going to perceive this hearing."
Yet, the Bush Administration officials assured the committee members that the privacy impact of the evolved system is currently being investigated.
"Privacy and civil rights have been a top priority of this effort," the DHS's Jamison said. "EINSTEIN has a privacy impact assessment that is public. We are working on a new one."
The original assessment, completed in September 2004, found that the EINSTEIN system did not need to have Privacy Act System of Records "because the program is not intended to collect information that will be retrieved by name or personal identifier."
The committee also took issue with the DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff's decision to appoint Scott Charbo, the former CIO for the department, to the position of Deputy Under Secretary in charge of implementing the program. Charbo had told the committee previously that he had not been briefed on incidents involving infiltration of government systems by foreign attackers. His reply -- "You don't know what you don't know." -- has become a symbol of the Bush Administration's lack of focus on cybersecurity issues.
"Your decision to promote Mr. Charbo to Deputy Under Secretary of National Programs and Plans effectively places him in charge of the cyber initiative at the Department," Rep. Thompson stated in a February letter to DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff. "Given his previous failings as Chief Information Officer, I find it unfathomable that you would invest him with this authority."
In a response to the letter, Secretary Chertoff defended Charbo, highlighting the changes that have happened under his watch.
If you have tips or insights on this topic, please contact SecurityFocus.